🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect women from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and heated discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked broad protest both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority support, the president could possibly return the bill for additional consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence comparable discussions in additional EU countries