🔗 Share this article

These days exhibit a quite unique occurrence: the inaugural US procession of the babysitters. They vary in their expertise and traits, but they all possess the same mission – to prevent an Israeli infringement, or even destruction, of the delicate truce. Since the war concluded, there have been few occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s delegates on the ground. Only in the last few days featured the likes of a senior advisor, Steve Witkoff, a senator and Marco Rubio – all arriving to carry out their roles.

The Israeli government engages them fully. In just a few short period it initiated a set of operations in Gaza after the deaths of a pair of Israeli military personnel – leading, based on accounts, in scores of Palestinian casualties. Several ministers urged a resumption of the fighting, and the Knesset passed a early measure to annex the West Bank. The American response was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

But in several ways, the Trump administration appears more intent on maintaining the present, unstable phase of the ceasefire than on progressing to the following: the rehabilitation of the Gaza Strip. When it comes to that, it seems the US may have goals but no tangible strategies.

At present, it remains uncertain at what point the proposed global governing body will actually take power, and the identical applies to the appointed military contingent – or even the makeup of its personnel. On Tuesday, Vance stated the US would not force the composition of the international unit on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's administration keeps to dismiss multiple options – as it acted with the Ankara's offer this week – what follows? There is also the opposite point: which party will determine whether the forces favoured by Israel are even willing in the assignment?

The matter of the duration it will need to neutralize Hamas is similarly ambiguous. “The aim in the administration is that the international security force is will now take the lead in neutralizing Hamas,” stated the official recently. “It’s going to take a period.” Trump further reinforced the lack of clarity, saying in an discussion a few days ago that there is no “hard” schedule for the group to demilitarize. So, hypothetically, the unknown participants of this still unformed global force could arrive in Gaza while Hamas fighters still wield influence. Are they facing a leadership or a insurgent group? These are just a few of the issues emerging. Others might ask what the verdict will be for ordinary Palestinians under current conditions, with the group continuing to focus on its own political rivals and opposition.

Current events have afresh highlighted the omissions of local reporting on both sides of the Gaza boundary. Every outlet attempts to examine all conceivable perspective of Hamas’s violations of the ceasefire. And, in general, the situation that Hamas has been stalling the repatriation of the remains of killed Israeli hostages has monopolized the coverage.

On the other hand, attention of non-combatant deaths in the region caused by Israeli attacks has received scant notice – or none. Consider the Israeli retaliatory attacks after a recent southern Gaza event, in which a pair of military personnel were killed. While Gaza’s sources claimed dozens of deaths, Israeli media pundits complained about the “light response,” which focused on solely installations.

This is nothing new. During the recent weekend, the information bureau alleged Israeli forces of breaking the truce with the group 47 times since the truce began, killing 38 individuals and wounding an additional 143. The allegation was unimportant to the majority of Israeli reporting – it was just ignored. That included information that 11 members of a Palestinian family were fatally shot by Israeli troops recently.

Gaza’s rescue organization stated the family had been seeking to return to their dwelling in the Zeitoun area of the city when the transport they were in was fired upon for reportedly passing the “demarcation line” that demarcates zones under Israeli army command. That yellow line is not visible to the naked eye and is visible only on maps and in government records – not always available to average individuals in the region.

Even that incident hardly received a mention in Israeli news outlets. Channel 13 News mentioned it briefly on its digital site, referencing an Israeli military official who stated that after a questionable transport was spotted, troops fired warning shots towards it, “but the vehicle kept to advance on the soldiers in a manner that caused an imminent danger to them. The soldiers opened fire to remove the threat, in compliance with the agreement.” Zero fatalities were claimed.

With this perspective, it is understandable numerous Israelis think the group alone is to responsible for infringing the ceasefire. That perception threatens encouraging appeals for a tougher approach in Gaza.

Eventually – possibly sooner than expected – it will not be sufficient for US envoys to play caretakers, advising the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need